linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/4] ioat: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() instead of pci_enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:50:59 -0800
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/4] ioat: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() instead
 of pci_enable_msix()

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:09:39PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Can you point me to the background for this change.  From the
>> changelog I have no idea what this patch does or why I need to apply
>> it.
>
> Function pci_enable_msix() returns a tri-state value while
> pci_enable_msi_exact() is a canonical zero/-errno variant.
> The former is being phased out in favor of the latter.
> In case of 'ioat' there (should be) no difference.

Got it.  If you resend with that in the changelog.

Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/