[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140306153530.bd61c160ba6f7872d6967b2e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:35:30 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kys@...rosoft.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, apw@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: net and drivers/net: Warn on missing blank
line after variable declaration
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:28:40 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> Networking prefers this style, so warn when it's not used.
>
> Networking uses:
>
> void foo(int bar)
> {
> int baz;
>
> code...
> }
>
> not
>
> void foo(int bar)
> {
> int baz;
> code...
> }
>
> There are a limited number of false positives when using
> macros to declare variables like:
>
> WARNING: networking uses a blank line after declarations
> #330: FILE: net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c:330:
> + int dif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
> + INET_ADDR_COOKIE(acookie, saddr, daddr)
um wait wut wot.
*All* kernel code uses blank line between end-of-locals and
start-of-code. Or if it doesn't it should, thwap.
Why are we special-casing net/?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists