[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5319849C.2000804@st.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:34:36 +0100
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>,
Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kernel@...inux.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pinctrl: st: Enhance the controller to manage unavailable
registers
On 03/07/2014 04:10 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@...com> wrote:
>
>> From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
>>
>> This patch adds a new logic inside the st pinctrl to manage
>> an unsupported scenario: some sysconfig are not available!
>>
>> This is the case of STiH407 where, although documented, the
>> following registers from SYSCFG_FLASH have been removed from the SoC.
>>
>> SYSTEM_CONFIG3040
>> Output Enable pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions
>> and
>> SYSTEM_ CONFIG3050
>> Pull Up pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions
>>
>> Without managing this condition an imprecise external abort
>> will be detect.
>>
>> To do this the patch also reviews the st_parse_syscfgs
>> and other routines to manipulate the registers only if
>> actually available.
>> In any case, for example the st_parse_syscfgs detected
>> an error condition but no action was made in the
>> st_pctl_probe_dt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
>
> Hm this does not apply to my tree at all. It appears this is not
> a stand-alone, patch, so it depends on some other patch to
> pinctrl-sti?
Yes, it depends on patch 2 of the series (which is based on v3.14-rc4).
This is my mistake, the title of patch 2 is wrong:
ARM: STi: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC
Should be:
pinctrl: st: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC
I will resend the pinctrl patches rebased on your tree.
Thanks,
Maxime
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists