linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5][RFC][CFT] percpu fixes, part 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140307123032.GB30778@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Fri, 7 Mar 2014 07:30:32 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Tweedie <sct@...hat.com>,
	Jeremy Eder <jeder@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5][RFC][CFT] percpu fixes, part 1

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 02:52:06AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:47:26PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> > Not much, but it should at least help bisection if something goes
> > wrong, I think.
> 
> OK.  It looks better when folding pcpu_split_block() into the caller
> is done as the first step.  See the attached 3 patches - combination
> is the same, modulo comment addition and switching seen_free to bool.

All look good to me.  Applying them to percpu/for-3.15.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/