[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877g866i3c.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:20:39 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 03/11] mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> writes:
>
> Per-process flags are a scarce resource so we should free them up
> whenever possible and make them available. We'll be using it shortly for
> memcg oom reserves.
I'm not convinced TCP_RR is a meaningfull benchmark for slab.
The shortness seems like an artificial problem.
Just add another flag word to the task_struct? That would seem
to be the obvious way. People will need it sooner or later anyways.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists