linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: inetfilter: LLVMLinux: vlais-netfilter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140307172627.GA4856@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:26:27 +0100
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	behanw@...verseincode.com
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, pageexec@...email.hu,
	Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>,
	Vinícius Tinti <viniciustinti@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: inetfilter: LLVMLinux: vlais-netfilter

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:56:08AM -0800, behanw@...verseincode.com wrote:
> From: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>
> 
> Replaced non-standard C use of Variable Length Arrays In Structs (VLAIS) in
> xt_repldata.h with a C99 compliant flexible array member and then calculated
> offsets to the other struct members. These other members aren't referenced by
> name in this code, however this patch maintains the same memory layout and
> padding as was previously accomplished using VLAIS.
> 
> Had the original structure been ordered differently, with the entries VLA at
> the end, then it could have been a flexible member, and this patch would have
> been a lot simpler. However since the data stored in this structure is
> ultimately exported to userspace, the order of this structure can't be changed.
> 
> This patch makes no attempt to change the existing behavior, merely the way in
> which the current layout is accomplished using standard C99 constructs. As such
> the code can now be compiled with either gcc or clang.

I think we already agreed on not accepting macro tricks to get this
compiling with clang:

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel/45138
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/