lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:09:50 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/net/Makefile: Define PACKAGE to fix bfd build

From: Markos Chandras <>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:18:28 +0000

> On 03/06/2014 05:54 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Markos Chandras <>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:15:54 +0000
>>> Fixes the following build problem with binutils-2.24
>>> gcc -Wall -O2   -c -o bpf_jit_disasm.o bpf_jit_disasm.c
>>> In file included from bpf_jit_disasm.c:25:0:
>>> /usr/include/bfd.h:35:2: error: #error config.h must be included
>>> before this header
>>>   #error config.h must be included before this header
>>> This is similar to commit 3ce711a6abc27abce1554e1d671a8762b7187690
>>> "perf tools: bfd.h/libbfd detection fails with recent binutils"
>>> See:
>>> CC: David S. Miller <>
>>> CC: Daniel Borkmann <>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <>
>> I think your subject needs to be adjusted, this patch doesn't fix a
>> "bfd"
>> build problem.
> Hi David,
> Thanks for the comment. Well it's problem caused by the bfd
> header. However, I suppose you can remove the 'bfd' word from the
> subject as I understand it's confusing. Would you be able to fix this
> before you apply this patch or should I send a new patch?

Please send a new patch, thanks.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists