[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140307183959.GE5255@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 19:39:59 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
greg@...ah.com, jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] kexec: Support for loading ELF x86_64 images
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 06:12:33PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > +/* Fill in fields which are usually present in bzImage */
> > > > +static int init_linux_parameters(struct boot_params *params)
> > > > +{
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * FIXME: It is odd that the information which comes from kernel
> > > > + * has to be faked by loading kernel. I guess it is limitation of
> > > > + * ELF format. Right now keeping it same as kexec-tools
> > > > + * implementation. But this most likely needs fixing.
> > > > + */
> > > > + memcpy(¶ms->hdr.header, "HdrS", 4);
> > > > + params->hdr.version = 0x0206;
> > > > + params->hdr.initrd_addr_max = 0x37FFFFFF;
> > > > + params->hdr.cmdline_size = 2048;
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
...
> Well, this is mandated by the boot protocol, no?
>
> "If the "HdrS" (0x53726448) magic number is not found at offset 0x202,
> the boot protocol version is "old". Loading an old kernel, the
> following parameters should be assumed:
>
> Image type = zImage
> initrd not supported
> Real-mode kernel must be located at 0x90000."
>
> About version 0x0206:
>
> Field name: cmdline_size
> Type: read
> Offset/size: 0x238/4
> Protocol: 2.06+
>
> The maximum size of the command line without the terminating
> zero. This means that the command line can contain at most
> cmdline_size characters. With protocol version 2.05 and earlier, the
> maximum size was 255.
>
> So according to the protocol, cmdline_size should be set by
> kexec_file_load and not hardcoded to 2K, if we're mandating protocol
> version 2.06.
Btw, all those fields above are of type "read", which means,
"For each field, some are information from the kernel to the bootloader
("read"),... "
Now, if we assume that the first kernel is the bootloader and it loads
the second kernel, then the first kernel shouldn't be setting all those
fields *at* *all* because it violates the boot protocol. And that's a
no-no.
Generally, how important is that use case for loading ELF images? If no
one is actually using it, why even bother?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists