linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] mm/compaction: Break out of loop on !PageBuddy in isolate_freepages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <531A49ED.4020302@suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2014 23:36:29 +0100
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mm/compaction: Break out of loop on !PageBuddy in isolate_freepages_block

On 6.3.2014 19:21, Laura Abbott wrote:
> We received several reports of bad page state when freeing CMA pages
> previously allocated with alloc_contig_range:
>
> <1>[ 1258.084111] BUG: Bad page state in process Binder_A  pfn:63202
> <1>[ 1258.089763] page:d21130b0 count:0 mapcount:1 mapping:  (null) index:0x7dfbf
> <1>[ 1258.096109] page flags: 0x40080068(uptodate|lru|active|swapbacked)
>
> Based on the page state, it looks like the page was still in use. The page
> flags do not make sense for the use case though. Further debugging showed
> that despite alloc_contig_range returning success, at least one page in the
> range still remained in the buddy allocator.
>
> There is an issue with isolate_freepages_block. In strict mode (which CMA
> uses), if any pages in the range cannot be isolated,
> isolate_freepages_block should return failure 0. The current check keeps
> track of the total number of isolated pages and compares against the size
> of the range:
>
>          if (strict && nr_strict_required > total_isolated)
>                  total_isolated = 0;
>
> After taking the zone lock, if one of the pages in the range is not
> in the buddy allocator, we continue through the loop and do not
> increment total_isolated. If in the last iteration of the loop we isolate
> more than one page (e.g. last page needed is a higher order page), the
> check for total_isolated may pass and we fail to detect that a page was
> skipped. The fix is to bail out if the loop immediately if we are in
> strict mode. There's no benfit to continuing anyway since we need all
> pages to be isolated. Additionally, drop the error checking based on
> nr_strict_required and just check the pfn ranges. This matches with
> what isolate_freepages_range does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

> ---
> v2: Addressed several comments by Vlastimil
>
>   mm/compaction.c |   20 +++++++++++++-------
>   1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 5142920..054c28b 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,6 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
>   {
>   	int nr_scanned = 0, total_isolated = 0;
>   	struct page *cursor, *valid_page = NULL;
> -	unsigned long nr_strict_required = end_pfn - blockpfn;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	bool locked = false;
>   	bool checked_pageblock = false;
> @@ -256,11 +255,12 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
>   
>   		nr_scanned++;
>   		if (!pfn_valid_within(blockpfn))
> -			continue;
> +			goto isolate_fail;
> +
>   		if (!valid_page)
>   			valid_page = page;
>   		if (!PageBuddy(page))
> -			continue;
> +			goto isolate_fail;
>   
>   		/*
>   		 * The zone lock must be held to isolate freepages.
> @@ -289,12 +289,10 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
>   
>   		/* Recheck this is a buddy page under lock */
>   		if (!PageBuddy(page))
> -			continue;
> +			goto isolate_fail;
>   
>   		/* Found a free page, break it into order-0 pages */
>   		isolated = split_free_page(page);
> -		if (!isolated && strict)
> -			break;
>   		total_isolated += isolated;
>   		for (i = 0; i < isolated; i++) {
>   			list_add(&page->lru, freelist);
> @@ -305,7 +303,15 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
>   		if (isolated) {
>   			blockpfn += isolated - 1;
>   			cursor += isolated - 1;
> +			continue;
>   		}
> +
> +isolate_fail:
> +		if (strict)
> +			break;
> +		else
> +			continue;
> +
>   	}
>   
>   	trace_mm_compaction_isolate_freepages(nr_scanned, total_isolated);
> @@ -315,7 +321,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
>   	 * pages requested were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is
>   	 * returned and CMA will fail.
>   	 */
> -	if (strict && nr_strict_required > total_isolated)
> +	if (strict && blockpfn < end_pfn)
>   		total_isolated = 0;
>   
>   	if (locked)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/