[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140307230420.GH29018@mwanda>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 02:04:21 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
alistair@...ple.id.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: rfc: checkpatch logical line continuations (was IBM Akebono: Add
support for a new PHY interface to the IBM emac driver)
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:30:17PM -0800, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:02:44PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 15:41 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>
> > > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:52:25 +1100
> > >
> > > > + out_be32(dev->reg, in_be32(dev->reg) | WKUP_ETH_RGMIIEN
> > > > + | WKUP_ETH_TX_OE | WKUP_ETH_RX_IE);
> > >
> > > When an expression spans multiple lines, the lines should end with
> > > operators rather than begin with them.
> >
> > That's not in CodingStyle currently.
>
> It's also not even remotely consistent across existing kernel code, and
> it isn't obvious that there's a general developer consensus on the
> "right" way to write it.
>
We just had this discussion in staging and Greg modified the patch to
put the operator at the end.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/25/125
It's like logical && and || operators which go at the end these days.
I don't really want to have a lot of checkpatch churn to convert
everything...
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists