[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <531A4E84.9996.3260AF06@pageexec.freemail.hu>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 23:56:04 +0100
From: "PaX Team" <pageexec@...email.hu>
To: khali@...ux-fr.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, behanw@...verseincode.com
CC: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>,
Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: LLVMLinux: Remove unused function warning from __param_check macro
On 7 Mar 2014 at 11:08, behanw@...verseincode.com wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> index c3eb102..5ce1f67 100644
> --- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ static inline void destroy_params(const struct kernel_param *params,
> /* The macros to do compile-time type checking stolen from Jakub
> Jelinek, who IIRC came up with this idea for the 2.4 module init code. */
> #define __param_check(name, p, type) \
> + static inline type *__check_##name(void) __attribute__ ((unused)); \
> static inline type *__check_##name(void) { return(p); }
why can't you have the attr on the definition itself:
static inline __unused type *__check_##name(void) { return(p); }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists