[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394151380.2555.3.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:16:20 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
mgorman@...e.de, alex.shi@...aro.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: mm: clean up tlb flushing code
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 16:45 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> The
>
> if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), smp_processor_id()) < nr_cpu_ids)
>
> line of code is not exactly the easiest to audit, especially when
> it ends up at two different indentation levels. This eliminates
> one of the the copy-n-paste versions. It also gives us a unified
> exit point for each path through this function. We need this in
> a minute for our tracepoint.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN arch/x86/mm/tlb.c~simplify-tlb-code arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c~simplify-tlb-code 2014-03-05 16:10:09.607047728 -0800
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c 2014-03-05 16:10:09.610047866 -0800
> @@ -161,23 +161,24 @@ void flush_tlb_current_task(void)
> void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> unsigned long end, unsigned long vmflag)
> {
> + int need_flush_others_all = 1;
nit: this can be bool.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists