linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] module: LLVMLinux: Remove unused function warning from __param

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:35:39 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	pageexec@...email.hu
CC:	khali@...ux-fr.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: LLVMLinux: Remove unused function warning from
 __param_check macro

On 03/07/14 17:25, PaX Team wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2014 at 16:52, Behan Webster wrote:
>
>> On 03/07/14 14:56, PaX Team wrote:
>>> why can't you have the attr on the definition itself:
>>>
>>> static inline __unused type *__check_##name(void) { return(p); }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> "__unused" isn't defined anywhere I can find, except in:
>>
>> src/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/declance.c:#define __unused 
>> __attribute__ ((unused))
> oh i forgot about that, you'd of course place this #define
> into the appropriate compiler*.h files so that other code
> can make use of it in the future as well ;).
>

It looks like it already exists, __always_unused.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/