lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:27:28 -0500 From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: eparis@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, rgb@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough On Friday, March 07, 2014 07:48:01 PM David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> > Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:52:02 -0500 > > > Audit is non-tolerant to failure and loss. > > Netlink is not a loss-less transport. Perhaps. But in all our testing over the years its been very good. -Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists