lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:36:57 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, seiji.aguchi@....com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes for v3.14-rc6

And yes, of course the change from hardcoded 2 to X86_TRAP_NMI was an afterthought.

On March 7, 2014 7:03:09 PM PST, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>Oww, oww, oww.
>
>DAMMIT.
>
>On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
>wrote:
>>
>> A small collection of minor fixes.  The FPU stuff is still pending, I
>> fear.  I haven't heard anything from Suresh so I suspect I'm going to
>> have to dig into the init specifics myself and fix up the patchset.
>
>I pulled this and then pushed out without test-compiling, because I'm
>not used to the x86 trees causing problems. Usually they've gone
>through a lot of build tests etc.
>
>But dammit, it's broken:
>
>  arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o: In function `early_idt_handler':
>  (.init.text+0x124): undefined reference to `X86_TRAP_NMI'
>
>because X86_TRAP_NMI is an enum, not a #define.
>
>This can not have worked in your tree either, because that thing has
>never been anything *but* an enum. So I'm pissed off. This patch was
>clearly never tested anywhere. Why was it sent to me?
>
>Grr. Consider yourself cursed at. Saatana.
>
>              Linus

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists