linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: LLVMLinux: Remove VLAIS usage from mac80211

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140308145309.GA1615@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 8 Mar 2014 15:53:10 +0100
From:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To:	Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linville@...driver.com,
	johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	pageexec@...email.hu,
	Jan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@....de>,
	Vinícius Tinti <viniciustinti@...il.com>,
	Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mac80211: LLVMLinux: Remove VLAIS usage from mac80211

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 06:15:43PM -0800, Behan Webster wrote:
> On 03/07/14 17:56, Joe Perches wrote:
> >On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 17:26 -0800, behanw@...verseincode.com wrote:
> >>From: Jan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@....de>
> >>
> >>Replaced the use of a Variable Length Array In Struct (VLAIS) with a C99
> >>compliant equivalent. This is the original VLAIS struct.
> >[]
> >>diff --git a/net/mac80211/aes_ccm.c b/net/mac80211/aes_ccm.c
> >[]
> >>@@ -23,12 +23,14 @@ void ieee80211_aes_ccm_encrypt(struct crypto_aead *tfm, u8 *b_0, u8 *aad,
> >>  			       u8 *data, size_t data_len, u8 *mic)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct scatterlist assoc, pt, ct[2];
> >>-	struct {
> >>-		struct aead_request	req;
> >>-		u8			priv[crypto_aead_reqsize(tfm)];
> >>-	} aead_req;
> >>-	memset(&aead_req, 0, sizeof(aead_req));
> >>+	char aead_req_data[sizeof(struct aead_request) +
> >>+				crypto_aead_reqsize(tfm) +
> >>+				CRYPTO_MINALIGN] CRYPTO_MINALIGN_ATTR;
> >Can this be a too large amount of stack?
> >
> >Is crypto_aead_reqsize() limited to < ~1k?
> >
> >Perhaps it'd be better to use kzalloc for this
> >or another reserved pool
> No more stack being used than with the the original code. The stack
> memory use is identical.

Could you explain that? It looks like aead_req_data can be bigger than
original struct aead_req up to CRYPTO_MINALIGN bytes. IOW adding
CRYPTO_MINALIGN to size seems unneeded as aead_request->__ctx alignment
requirement should by assured by proper sizeof(struct aead_request).

Besides, why not add VLAIS feature to llvm instead of fixing all
programs that use it?

Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/