[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <531B3331.9050008@euromail.se>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 16:11:45 +0100
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
CC: jcbian@...cir.com.cn, balbi@...com, dmurphy@...com,
mugunthanvnm@...com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] Input: pixcir_i2c_ts: Use Type-B Multi-Touch protocol
Hi Roger,
the MT implementation seems mostly fine, just one curiosity:
> static irqreturn_t pixcir_ts_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct pixcir_i2c_ts_data *tsdata = dev_id;
> const struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pdata = tsdata->chip;
> + struct pixcir_report_data report;
>
> while (!tsdata->exiting) {
> - pixcir_ts_poscheck(tsdata);
> -
> - if (gpio_get_value(pdata->gpio_attb))
> + /* parse packet */
> + pixcir_ts_parse(tsdata, &report);
> +
> + /* report it */
> + pixcir_ts_report(tsdata, &report);
> +
> + if (gpio_get_value(pdata->gpio_attb)) {
> + if (report.num_touches) {
> + /*
> + * Last report with no finger up?
> + * Do it now then.
> + */
> + input_mt_sync_frame(tsdata->input);
> + input_sync(tsdata->input);
Why is this special handling needed?
Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists