[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLiAi9Yofimw5tUvz2HELRWAJBaj3XXWaN-EHK_wANZDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 16:23:29 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Liu ShuoX <shuox.liu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: reset ftrace_read_cnt at ramoops_pstore_open
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:58:43 +0800 Liu ShuoX <shuox.liu@...el.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> ftrace_read_cnt need to be reset in open to support mutli times
>> getting the records.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu ShuoX <shuox.liu@...el.com>
>> ---
>> fs/pstore/ram.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
>> index fa8cef2..9fe5b13 100644
>> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
>> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct ramoops_context {
>> struct persistent_ram_ecc_info ecc_info;
>> unsigned int max_dump_cnt;
>> unsigned int dump_write_cnt;
>> + /* _read_cnt need clear on ramoops_pstore_open */
>> unsigned int dump_read_cnt;
>> unsigned int console_read_cnt;
>> unsigned int ftrace_read_cnt;
>> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ static int ramoops_pstore_open(struct pstore_info *psi)
>>
>> cxt->dump_read_cnt = 0;
>> cxt->console_read_cnt = 0;
>> + cxt->ftrace_read_cnt = 0;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -428,7 +430,6 @@ static int ramoops_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (pdata->ftrace_size && !is_power_of_2(pdata->ftrace_size))
>> pdata->ftrace_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(pdata->ftrace_size);
>>
>> - cxt->dump_read_cnt = 0;
>> cxt->size = pdata->mem_size;
>> cxt->phys_addr = pdata->mem_address;
>> cxt->record_size = pdata->record_size;
>
> The dump_read_cnt changes appear to be unrelated to the actual bugfix?
I recommended this change since it is being cleared during open, and
this zeroing was confusing.
> If so, please send this along as a separate patch. With a full
> changelog - this one doesn't explain the dump_read_cnt changes at all.
Liu, I would recommend a changelog along the lines of:
Clarify which variables need to be cleared during pstore_open. Added
missed ftrace_read_cnt clearing and removed duplicate clearing in
ramoops_probe.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists