linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] score: remove unused CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1394308828.431.5.camel@x220>
Date:	Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:00:28 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>
Cc:	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] score: remove unused CPU_SCORE7 Kconfig
 parameter

Lennox,

On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 14:34 +0800, Lennox Wu wrote:
> According to my record, I had told you we have another
> processor(2013/11/4), hence, we need the parameter.
> We just wirte it done first. Do you remember it?

In https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/76 I already reported that this
Kconfig symbol was unused. Why can't it be dropped and re-added when
code is added to the tree that actually uses it?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/