[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140309202107.GA2835@katana>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 21:21:07 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nsekhar@...com, khilman@...prootsystems.com,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-davinci: Handle signals gracefully
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:11:25PM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> When a signal is caught while the i2c-davinci bus driver is transferring,
> the drive just "abandons" the transfer and leaves the controller to fend
> for itself. The next I2C transaction will find the controller in an
> undefined state and often results in a stream of "initiating i2c bus recovery"
> messages until the controller arrives in a defined state. This behaviour
> also sends out "half" or possibly even mixed messages to I2C client
> devices which may put them in an undesired state as well.
>
> This patch fixes this issue by always attempting to finish the current
> transaction, and then check on a pending signal. It either reports
> success if all data has been transferred, or it returns failure when
> the transaction was aborted. This keeps the controller in a defined
> state, and is also much friendlier towards client devices, because
> it will only send complete messages.
Even more, you should complete the whole transfer. There are devices
where things can really go wrong if you send a half-complete command and
then start with the next one. So, not checking signals at all is the way
to go for I2C drivers. There is some cruft left, so I am happy about
patches fixing that, with testing on real HW. Like yours here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists