[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394335345.11969.34.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 19:22:25 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davi@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: per-thread vma caching
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 12:02 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sure. But another thread or CLONE_VM task can do vmacache_invalidate(),
> > hit vmacache_seqnum == 0 and call vmacache_flush_all() to solve the
> > problem with potential overflow.
>
> How?
>
> Any invalidation is supposed to hold the mm semaphore for writing. And
> we should have it for reading.
Yes, invalidations are always with the write lock held. In any case it's
a good candidate to use verify_mm_writelocked(), even if it's only under
debug environments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists