[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <531BEBB1.1080905@samsung.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:18:57 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/99] 3.4.83-stable review
On 03/08/2014 01:50 PM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> At Sat, 08 Mar 2014 09:10:00 -0800,
> Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>> On 03/08/2014 08:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 06:35:52AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On 03/08/2014 01:47 AM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>>>>> At Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:06:56 -0800,
>>>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.83 release.
>>>>>> There are 99 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Responses should be made by Mon Mar 10 01:05:53 UTC 2014.
>>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> This kernel passed my test.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Same here.
>>>>
>>>> Built results:
>>>> total: 119 pass: 97 skipped: 18 fail: 4
>>>>
>>>> qemu tests all passed.
>>>>
>>>> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
>>>
>>> Thanks to both of you for testing this, much appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> You are welcome.
>>
>> Can you possibly add me to the cc: of your introductory e-mail
>> announcing new stable releases ? Sometimes it seems to get lost
>> and isn't available on any of the 'common' archives (this one
>> did not make it to lkml, for example, and many of the individual
>> mails didn't make it into the stable mailing list at gmane).
>
> Me too.
>
Compile tests and boot tests passed on all my test systems. No dmesg
regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.
I have a similar request for cc. The first message seems to get lost and
messages don't get threaded correctly. Could you please cc me on the of
your introductory e-mail.
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists