[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403100744230.23103@jringle-ubuntu>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:50:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Ringle <jon@...gle.org>
To: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
cc: jon@...gle.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Jon Ringle <jringle@...dpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: WIP: sc16is7xx [v0.4]
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Понедельник, 10 марта 2014, 2:26 -04:00 от jon@...gle.org:
> > From: Jon Ringle <jringle@...dpoint.com>
> ...
> > +config SERIAL_SC16IS7XX
> > + tristate "SC16IS7xx RS485 serial support"
> > + select SERIAL_CORE
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + This selects support for SC16IS7xx for use as a RS485 serial port
>
> Documentation says:
> The SC16IS740/750/760 is a slave I²C-bus/SPI interface to a single-channel
> high performance UART.
> ...
> The SC16IS740/750/760 also provides additional advanced features such
> as auto hardware and software flow control, automatic RS-485 support...
>
> So why do you position this chip as RS485 only? Automatic direction for
> RS485 is just a feature as an addition for standart UART.
You're right. This is just how we are using the chip in our board. Would a
configuration flag in platform_data make sense to use the auto rs485
direction?
Any thoughts as to the latency issue I report?
Thanks.
Regards,
Jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists