linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140310102928.7b2a2cfa@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:29:28 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 +0000
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Here's the new patch:
> 
> Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it
> doesn't compile.  WTF?
> 

Hi Ben,

This is an old thread. Which kernel did you apply it to. Before I send
any patch set out, I run a small test (heavy stress test, and also
compile several different configs). This patch was against 3.10-rt, and
may have already had the includes needed. I know the original patch
compiled, but I may not have tested the second patch.

Do you need this patch? Or did I miss something for 3.2-rt?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/