linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1] x86: don't schedule when handling #NM exception

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <531DF57F.3040108@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:25:19 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
	Sarah Newman <srn@...mr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] x86: don't schedule when handling #NM exception

On 03/10/2014 10:15 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>>
>> And what the [Finnish] do you do if GFP_ATOMIC fails?
> 
> The same thing it used to do -- kill the task with SIGKILL.  I haven't
> changed this behaviour.
> 

No, you just made it many orders of magnitude more likely.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/