[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140310204054.10746.57627.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 02:10:54 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paulus@...ba.org, oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org, walken@...gle.com,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 43/52] thermal,
x86-pkg-temp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_notifier_register_done();
Fix the thermal x86-pkg-temp code by using this latter form of callback
registration.
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
index 081fd7e..9ea3d9d 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
@@ -590,12 +590,12 @@ static int __init pkg_temp_thermal_init(void)
platform_thermal_package_rate_control =
pkg_temp_thermal_platform_thermal_rate_control;
- get_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(i)
if (get_core_online(i))
goto err_ret;
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&pkg_temp_thermal_notifier);
- put_online_cpus();
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&pkg_temp_thermal_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
pkg_temp_debugfs_init(); /* Don't care if fails */
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static int __init pkg_temp_thermal_init(void)
err_ret:
for_each_online_cpu(i)
put_core_offline(i);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
kfree(pkg_work_scheduled);
platform_thermal_package_notify = NULL;
platform_thermal_package_rate_control = NULL;
@@ -617,8 +617,8 @@ static void __exit pkg_temp_thermal_exit(void)
struct phy_dev_entry *phdev, *n;
int i;
- get_online_cpus();
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&pkg_temp_thermal_notifier);
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();
+ __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&pkg_temp_thermal_notifier);
mutex_lock(&phy_dev_list_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(phdev, n, &phy_dev_list, list) {
/* Retore old MSR value for package thermal interrupt */
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static void __exit pkg_temp_thermal_exit(void)
for_each_online_cpu(i)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(
&per_cpu(pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work, i));
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
kfree(pkg_work_scheduled);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists