[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzPntnPHCbNa6PNdeKQmFBsF4JNu0BHix8LsP2ybYQ-Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 02:36:31 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
Andreas Brief <Andreas.Brief@...de-schwarz.com>,
Martin Runge <Martin.Runge@...de-schwarz.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Remove compat vdso support
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> I suspect that a lot of 32-bit Linux users want syscall and/or
> sysenter, and Stefani certainly wants the fast timing that the vDSO
> can provide. Also, presumably __kernel_sigreturn serves some purpose
> :)
Are we talking about the same thing at all?
We're talking about the *COMPAT* vdso, right?
The one you were just told Fedora had never _ever_ enabled? And you
are seriously arguing that "peformance" is relevant, while at the same
time trying to claim that the fact that it DOES NOT WORK on SuSE -
which *did* enable it - is not such a big deal, and that we should
ignore the "don't break user space" rule?
Seriously?
WTF?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists