linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: fix compilation warning in snb_uncore_imc_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140311111350.GU27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:13:50 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	hpa@...or.com, tglx@...uxtronic.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/uncore: fix compilation warning in
 snb_uncore_imc_init_box()

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:44:33AM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> 
> 
> This patches fixes a compilation problem (unused variable) with the
> new SNB/IVB/HSW uncore IMC code.
> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> index b262c61..3846a37 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> @@ -1722,15 +1722,19 @@ static struct attribute_group snb_uncore_imc_format_group = {
>  static void snb_uncore_imc_init_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = box->pci_dev;
> -	u32 addr_lo, addr_hi;
> +	u32 addr_lo;
>  	resource_size_t addr;
>  
>  	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SNB_UNCORE_PCI_IMC_BAR_OFFSET, &addr_lo);
>  	addr = addr_lo;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> -	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SNB_UNCORE_PCI_IMC_BAR_OFFSET+4, &addr_hi);
> -	addr = ((resource_size_t)addr_hi << 32) | addr_lo;
> +	{ u32 addr_hi;
> +	  int where = SNB_UNCORE_PCI_IMC_BAR_OFFSET + 4;
> +
> +	  pci_read_config_dword(pdev, where, &addr_hi);
> +	  addr = ((resource_size_t)addr_hi << 32) | addr_lo;
> +	}
>  #endif

How about something like:

- u32 addr_lo, addr_hi;
+ u32 pci_dword;

	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SNB_UNCORE_PCI_IMC_BAR_OFFSET, &pci_dword);
	addr = pci_dword;

#ifdef ..
	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SNB_UNCORE_PCI_IMC_BAR_OFFSET + 4, &pci_dword);
	addr |= ((u64)pci_dword) << 32;
#endif

That avoids the need for the ugly {} thing. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/