linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] USB Host support for OMAP5 uEVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140311162428.GA7177@atomide.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:24:29 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, bcousson@...libre.com,
	balbi@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] USB Host support for OMAP5 uEVM

* Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> [140311 06:13]:
> On 03/11/2014 03:07 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 
> >>>>> This patchset brings up USB Host ports and Ethernet port on
> >>>>> the OMAP5 uEVM board.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It also does some cleanup with respect to DT clock binding
> >>>>> for the mfd/omap-usb-host driver.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please queue these for -next.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lee,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've folded some platform data dependent patches with mfd patches
> >>>>> so that they don't break functionality when applied individually.
> >>>>> You can safely pull in all MFD patches (1 to 6).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tony & Benoit,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you please accept patches 7, 8 and 9?
> >>>>
> >>>> Tony has already picked up 7,8 and 9 through omap-soc tree.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since you acked most patches except 5 and 6, are you fine if Tony takes
> >>>> all the patches 1 to 4 in this series via omap-soc tree?
> >>>>
> >>>> What about patches 5 and 6?
> >>>
> >>> Any patches which are orthogonal can just be sucked into whichever tree
> >>> they belong in. If there are inter-subsystem dependencies I'd prefer
> >>> to take them and issue a immutable branch pull-request to the other
> >>> maintainers.
> >>>
> >> Awesome. That would be great, thanks.
> > 
> > That does mean I need a) all of the Maintainer Acks and b) you to tell
> > me which ones need to go through a single tree.
> > 
> 
> You need to take patches 1 to 6 in the MFD tree. Out of these, patches 1 to 4
> need to be shared with Tony as an immutable branch.
> 
> Tony, could you please Ack patches 1 to 4? Thanks.

Changes in 1 to 6 look OK to me, so for those please feel free to add:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/