[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ee8da10-166e-45c1-925a-f089085fdff4@email.android.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:33:03 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
CC: ast@...mgrid.com, dborkman@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org,
wad@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
hagen@...u.net, jesse@...ira.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
edumazet@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
acme@...radead.org, penberg@....fi, arjan@...radead.org,
hch@...radead.org, xemul@...allels.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 1/3] filter: add Extended BPF interpreter and converter
Why not for variables? It makes a lot of sense of nothing else to avoid the confusion that invariably happens when someone decides to introduce the value 2 or -1 to an existing variable (and yes, thus has happened a number of times.)
Not to mention they take a single byte rather than four for an int if stored in memory.
On March 10, 2014 7:24:49 PM PDT, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:02:18 -0700
>
>> I would generally suggest that people only use "bool" for function
>> return types, and absolutely nothing else. Seriously.
>
>I think it makes sense for function arguments too.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists