[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <531F6527.6010508@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:33:59 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hhuang@...hat.com,
knoel@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mm,numa,mprotect: always continue after finding a
stable thp page
On 03/11/2014 03:28 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:18:02 -0400 Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>>> 3. Can you test with the following patches reverted please?
>>>
>>> e15d25d9c827b4346a36a3a78dd566d5ad353402 mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix-fix
>>> e440e20dc76803cdab616b4756c201d5c72857f2 mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix
>>> 0d9ad4220e6d73f63a9eeeaac031b92838f75bb3 mm: per-thread vma caching
>>>
>>> The last patch will not revert cleanly (least it didn't for me) but it
>>> was just a case of git rm the two affected files, remove any include of
>>> vmacache.h and commit the rest.
>>
>> Don't see the issues I've reported before now.
>
> This is foggy. Do you mean that all the bugs went away when
> per-thread-vma-caching was reverted?
No, sorry, just the vmacache_find and the mm/mmap.c:439 BUGs.
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists