[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394574323.2786.45.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:45:23 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mm: mmap_sem lock assertion failure in __mlock_vma_pages_range
On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 17:02 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 03/11/2014 04:47 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >> Bingo! With the above patch:
> >> >
> >> >[ 243.565794] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:76!
> >> >[ 243.566720] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> >> >[ 243.568048] Dumping ftrace buffer:
> >> >[ 243.568740] (ftrace buffer empty)
> >> >[ 243.569481] Modules linked in:
> >> >[ 243.570203] CPU: 10 PID: 10073 Comm: trinity-c332 Tainted: G W 3.14.0-rc5-next-20140307-sasha-00010-g1f812cb-dirty #143
> > and this is also part of the DEBUG_PAGEALLOC + trinity combo! I suspect
> > the root cause it the same as Fengguang's report.
>
> The BUG still happens without DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
Any idea what trinity itself is doing?
Could you add the following, I just want to make sure the bug isn't
being caused by an overflow:
diff --git a/mm/vmacache.c b/mm/vmacache.c
index add3162..abb85cc 100644
--- a/mm/vmacache.c
+++ b/mm/vmacache.c
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ void vmacache_flush_all(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
/*
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists