linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: Relocate the compat vdso per process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2014 23:14:54 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Martin Runge <Martin.Runge@...de-schwarz.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
	Andreas Brief <Andreas.Brief@...de-schwarz.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: Relocate the compat vdso per process

There is one sensible address: end of address space perhaps minus some small offset.  Unlikely to be used by anything specific.

On March 11, 2014 11:09:11 PM PDT, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>On Mar 11, 2014 10:02 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 03/11/2014 03:15 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> The meat of this patch series is in patch 1.  Patch 2 is split out
>for
>>> improved bisectability.
>>>
>>> Changes from v1: Split into two patches and fixed a comment.
>>>
>>> Andy Lutomirski (2):
>>>    x86: Dynamically relocate the compat vdso
>>>    x86_32: Remove user bit from identity map PDE
>>>
>>>   Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt  |  18 +++-
>>>   arch/x86/Kconfig                     |  24 +++--
>>>   arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h           |   4 -
>>>   arch/x86/include/asm/fixmap.h        |   8 --
>>>   arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h |   7 +-
>>>   arch/x86/include/asm/vdso.h          |   5 +-
>>>   arch/x86/vdso/vdso-layout.lds.S      |   2 +-
>>>   arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c         | 173
>++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>   arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/vdso32.lds.S    |   2 -
>>>   9 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Why per process?  *If* we have compat vdso turned on, can't we just
>put it in one place system-wide?
>
>My machine has ASLR turned on, and the vma really does end up
>somewhere different each time.  I suspect that most (?) ASLR users
>would happily accept the 4k hit to keep ASLR working fully.
>
>Another downside of trying to have a common address for all processes:
>someone needs to figure out what that address is.  What happens if an
>ELF binary (or interpreter) wants to load something at the chosen
>address?
>
>--Andy

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/