[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1394611269-7582-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:01:09 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] zram: support REQ_DISCARD
zram is ram based block device and can be used by backend of filesystem.
When filesystem deletes a file, it normally doesn't do anything on data
block of that file. It just marks on metadata of that file. This behavior
has no problem on disk based block device, but has problems on ram based
block device, since we can't free memory used for data block. To overcome
this disadvantage, there is REQ_DISCARD functionality. If block device
support REQ_DISCARD and filesystem is mounted with discard option,
filesystem sends REQ_DISCARD to block device whenever some data blocks are
discarded. All we have to do is to handle this request.
This patch implements to flag up QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD and handle this
REQ_DISCARD request. With it, we can free memory used by zram if it isn't
used.
v2: handle unaligned case commented by Jerome
v3: conditionally set zero to discard_zeroes_data commented by Minchan
reuse index, offset in __zram_make_request() commented by Sergey.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 7631ef0..8b468d6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -541,6 +541,33 @@ static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
return ret;
}
+static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
+ int offset, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ size_t n = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
+
+ /*
+ * On some arch, logical block (4096) aligned request couldn't be
+ * aligned to PAGE_SIZE, since their PAGE_SIZE aren't 4096.
+ * Therefore we should handle this misaligned case here.
+ */
+ if (offset) {
+ if (n < offset)
+ return;
+
+ n -= offset;
+ index++;
+ }
+
+ while (n >= PAGE_SIZE) {
+ write_lock(&zram->meta->tb_lock);
+ zram_free_page(zram, index);
+ write_unlock(&zram->meta->tb_lock);
+ index++;
+ n -= PAGE_SIZE;
+ }
+}
+
static void zram_reset_device(struct zram *zram, bool reset_capacity)
{
size_t index;
@@ -676,6 +703,12 @@ static void __zram_make_request(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
offset = (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector &
(SECTORS_PER_PAGE - 1)) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ if (unlikely(bio->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)) {
+ zram_bio_discard(zram, index, offset, bio);
+ bio_endio(bio, 0);
+ return;
+ }
+
bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter) {
int max_transfer_size = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
@@ -845,6 +878,17 @@ static int create_device(struct zram *zram, int device_id)
ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE);
blk_queue_io_min(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
blk_queue_io_opt(zram->disk->queue, PAGE_SIZE);
+ zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_granularity = PAGE_SIZE;
+ zram->disk->queue->limits.max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX;
+ /*
+ * We will skip to discard mis-aligned range, so we can't ensure
+ * whether discarded region is zero or not.
+ */
+ if (ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE)
+ zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 1;
+ else
+ zram->disk->queue->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 0;
+ queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, zram->disk->queue);
add_disk(zram->disk);
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists