lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140312083410.GF4706@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:34:10 +0800
From:	Chenhui Zhao <chenhui.zhao@...escale.com>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
CC:	<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<leoli@...escale.com>, <Jason.Jin@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] fsl: add EPU FSM configuration for deep sleep

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:58 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote:
> > From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@...escale.com>
> > 
> > In the last stage of deep sleep, software will trigger a Finite
> > State Machine (FSM) to control the hardware precedure, such as
> > board isolation, killing PLLs, removing power, and so on.
> > 
> > When the system is waked up by an interrupt, the FSM controls the
> > hardware to complete the early resume precedure.
> > 
> > This patch configure the EPU FSM preparing for deep sleep.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@...escale.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chenhui Zhao <chenhui.zhao@...escale.com>
> 
> Couldn't this be part of qoriq_pm.c?

Put the code in drivers/platform/fsl/ so that LS1 can share these code.

> 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.h b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.h
> > index 9b9a34a..eb83a30 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.h
> > @@ -69,5 +69,8 @@ extern const struct fsl_pm_ops *qoriq_pm_ops;
> >  
> >  extern int fsl_rcpm_init(void);
> >  
> > +extern void fsl_dp_fsm_setup(void *dcsr_base);
> > +extern void fsl_dp_fsm_clean(void *dcsr_base);
> 
> __iomem

Thanks. Will add.

> 
> > +
> >  #endif
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/Kconfig
> > index 09fde58..6539e6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/Kconfig
> > @@ -6,3 +6,7 @@ source "drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig"
> >  endif
> >  
> >  source "drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig"
> > +
> > +if FSL_SOC
> > +source "drivers/platform/fsl/Kconfig"
> > +endif
> 
> Chrome doesn't need an ifdef -- why does this?

Don't wish other platform see these options, and the X86 and GOLDFISH have
ifdefs.

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/Makefile b/drivers/platform/Makefile
> > index 3656b7b..37c6f72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/Makefile
> > @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_X86)		+= x86/
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_OLPC)		+= olpc/
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_GOLDFISH)		+= goldfish/
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CHROME_PLATFORMS)	+= chrome/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_SOC)		+= fsl/
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/fsl/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/fsl/Kconfig
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..72ed053
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/fsl/Kconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > +#
> > +# Freescale Specific Power Management Drivers
> > +#
> > +
> > +config FSL_SLEEP_FSM
> > +	bool
> > +	help
> > +	  This driver configures a hardware FSM (Finite State Machine) for deep sleep.
> > +	  The FSM is used to finish clean-ups at the last stage of system entering deep
> > +	  sleep, and also wakes up system when a wake up event happens.
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/fsl/Makefile b/drivers/platform/fsl/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d99ca0e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/fsl/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > +#
> > +# Makefile for linux/drivers/platform/fsl
> > +# Freescale Specific Power Management Drivers
> > +#
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_SLEEP_FSM)	+= sleep_fsm.o
> 
> Why is this here while the other stuff is in arch/powerpc/sysdev?
> 
> > +/* Block offsets */
> > +#define	RCPM_BLOCK_OFFSET	0x00022000
> > +#define	EPU_BLOCK_OFFSET	0x00000000
> > +#define	NPC_BLOCK_OFFSET	0x00001000
> 
> Why don't these block offsets come from the device tree?

Have maped DCSR registers. Don't wish to remap them.

> 
> > +static void *g_dcsr_base;
> 
> __iomem

OK.

> 
> > +	/* Configure the EPU Counters */
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR15, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR14, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR12, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR11, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR10, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR9, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR8, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR5, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR4, 0x92840000);
> > +	epu_write(EPCCR2, 0x92840000);
> > +
> > +	/* Configure the SCUs Inputs */
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR15, 0x76000000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR14, 0x00000031);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR13, 0x00003100);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR12, 0x7F000000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR11, 0x31740000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR10, 0x65000030);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR9, 0x00003000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR8, 0x64300000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR7, 0x30000000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR6, 0x7C000000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR5, 0x00002E00);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR4, 0x002F0000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR3, 0x2F000000);
> > +	epu_write(EPSMCR2, 0x6C700000);
> 
> Where do these magic numbers come from?  Which chips are they valid for?

They are for T1040. Can be found in the RCPM chapter of T1040RM.

> 
> > +void fsl_dp_fsm_clean(void *dcsr_base)
> > +{
> > +
> > +	epu_write(EPEVTCR2, 0);
> > +	epu_write(EPEVTCR9, 0);
> > +
> > +	epu_write(EPGCR, 0);
> > +	epu_write(EPECR15, 0);
> > +
> > +	rcpm_write(CSTTACR0, 0);
> > +	rcpm_write(CG1CR0, 0);
> > +
> > +}
> 
> Don't put blank lines at the beginning/end of a block.
> 
> -Scott

Thanks.

-Chenhui

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ