[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140312085401.GB21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:54:01 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:15:33PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> memblock is now fully integrated into the kernel and is the prefered
> method for tracking memory. Rather than reinvent the wheel with
> meminfo, migrate to using memblock directly instead of meminfo as
> an intermediate.
>
> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Tested-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
Laura,
This patch causes a bunch of platforms to no longer boot - imx6solo with
1GB of RAM boots, imx6q with 2GB of RAM doesn't. Versatile Express doesn't.
The early printk messages don't reveal anything too interesting:
Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
Linux version 3.14.0-rc6+ (rmk@...-PC.arm.linux.org.uk) (gcc version 4.6.4 (GCC) ) #630 SMP Wed Mar 12 01:13:36 GMT 2014
CPU: ARMv7 Processor [412fc09a] revision 10 (ARMv7), cr=10c53c7d
CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT aliasing instruction cache
Machine model: SolidRun Cubox-i Dual/Quad
cma: CMA: reserved 64 MiB at 8c000000
Memory policy: Data cache writealloc
<hang>
vs.
Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
Linux version 3.14.0-rc6+ (rmk@...-PC.arm.linux.org.uk) (gcc version 4.6.4 (GCC) ) #631 SMP Wed Mar 12 01:15:37 GMT 2014
CPU: ARMv7 Processor [412fc09a] revision 10 (ARMv7), cr=10c53c7d
CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, VIPT aliasing instruction cache
Machine model: SolidRun Cubox-i Dual/Quad
cma: CMA: reserved 64 MiB at 3b800000
Memory policy: Data cache writealloc
On node 0 totalpages: 524288
free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c09d0240, node_mem_map ea7d8000
Normal zone: 1520 pages used for memmap
Normal zone: 0 pages reserved
Normal zone: 194560 pages, LIFO batch:31
HighMem zone: 2576 pages used for memmap
HighMem zone: 329728 pages, LIFO batch:31
...
The only obvious difference is the address of that CMA reservation,
CMA shouldn't make a difference here - but I suspect that other
allocations which need to be in lowmem probably aren't.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists