[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140312005748.GQ25092@beef>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:57:48 -0400
From: Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu driver
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:40:30AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 07:25:45PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:45:17PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > Are there any inter-patch dependencies in the set? If so, we should
> > > know about them so we can coordinate a sensible solution.
>
> > Yes, the regulator driver (3/5) that Mark applied is dependent on this
> > patch...the regulator driver includes include/linux/mfd/bcm590xx.h.
>
> There's no actual dependency though - the regulator driver can only be
> built if the MFD is enabled in Kconfig since it depends on it so until
> the MFD is present in the tree it won't get built.
Oh, right. Lee, no dependencies then.
-Matt
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists