linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140311211402.6245c6d0@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2014 21:14:02 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument

On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
> > "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:34:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument
> > 
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:04:57 -0400
> > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Describe the @data argument (probe private data).
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 38516ab59fbc "tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to
> > > tracepoint callbacks"
> > > CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > 
> > No signed-off-by.
> 
> Hi Steven,
> 
> I'm curious to understand the reason of this "no signed-off-by" on a trivial
> patch that fixes the missing DocBook comments for one of your previous
> commits that has been upstream for a few years. What am I missing ?
> Perhaps you meant this reply for my other documentation update patch (2/2) ?
> 

I mean, my scripts wont accept a patch that the author never added
their signed-off-by to.

In other words, resubmit, and add your own signed-off-by that happens to
be missing from this patch.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/