linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V7 1/1] drivers/gpio: Altera soft IP GPIO driver and devicetree binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:52:12 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Gerhard Sittig <gsi@...x.de>
Cc:	Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>,
	"lftan@...era.com" <lftan@...era.com>,
	Tien Hock Loh <thloh.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/1] drivers/gpio: Altera soft IP GPIO driver and
 devicetree binding

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Gerhard Sittig <gsi@...x.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:31 +0800, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:27 PM,  <thloh@...era.com> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
>> >
>> > Add driver support for Altera GPIO soft IP, including interrupts and I/O.
>> > Tested on Altera CV SoC board using dipsw and LED using LED framework.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
>>
>> Can I get some ACKs on this? Like from Gerhard, DT folks?
>>
>> Or is there still more things to do?
>
> Sorry, had flagged the patch for review, but did not get around
> to respond earlier.  No ACK from me for v7 as it is.

OK I'm holding this back.

> Am I supposed to provide ACKs at all, given that I'm a reviewer
> and fellow developer.  I always understood that Acked-By is
> something more formal, where one maintainer signals to another
> maintainer that it's OK to go though a different tree.

In this case I want an Acked-by/Reviewed-by tag (choose!)
beacuse I trust your ability to review this specific code, as simple as
that.  :-)

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/