[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140312145300.GC14688@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:53:00 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] mm: memcg: inline mem_cgroup_charge_common()
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:52:13PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 11-03-14 21:28:29, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -3919,20 +3919,21 @@ out:
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Charge the memory controller for page usage.
> > - * Return
> > - * 0 if the charge was successful
> > - * < 0 if the cgroup is over its limit
> > - */
> > -static int mem_cgroup_charge_common(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > - gfp_t gfp_mask, enum charge_type ctype)
> > +int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page,
> > + struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>
> s/mem_cgroup_newpage_charge/mem_cgroup_anon_charge/ ?
>
> Would be a better name? The patch would be bigger but the name more
> apparent...
I wouldn't be opposed to fixing those names at all, but I think that
is out of the scope of this patch. Want to send one?
mem_cgroup_charge_anon() would be a good name, but then we should also
rename mem_cgroup_cache_charge() to mem_cgroup_charge_file() to match.
Or charge_private() vs. charge_shared()...
> Other than that I am good with this. Without (preferably) or without
> rename:
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists