[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140312121933.40f63087@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:19:33 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>, arnd@...db.de,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
walken@...gle.com, andi@...stfloor.org, riel@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking: qspinlock
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:57:54 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> I build and booted these patches against tip/master as of this morning.
> It build ~50 defconfig kernels on my WSM-EP.
>
> I've not managed to reproduce the hang as reported by Dave, but then I
> doubt building kernels has anywhere near the lock contention he
> generated.
>
Have you tried hackbench? That usually gives rq spinlocks a bit of
contention.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists