[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuwUFhJdvtdrO8xcqytPRm=iqfkVu1Q6RzyzeuEeSpay0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:34:54 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@....fi>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 net-next 1/3] filter: add Extended BPF interpreter and converter
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:22 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:41:30 -0700
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index 1a869488b8ae..2c13d000389c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -3054,6 +3054,7 @@ extern int netdev_max_backlog;
>> extern int netdev_tstamp_prequeue;
>> extern int weight_p;
>> extern int bpf_jit_enable;
>> +extern int bpf_ext_enable;
>
> I don't like seeing config ifdefs in C code, so please adjust the
> bpf_jit_enable declaration with something like:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
> extern int bpf_jit_enable;
> #else
> #define bpf_jit_enable 0
> #endif
agree. that's definitely cleaner.
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>> + DL(BPF_STX, BPF_XADD, BPF_DW)
>> +#endif
> ...
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>> +BPF_STX_BPF_XADD_BPF_DW: /* lock xadd *(u64 *)(A + insn->off) += X */
>> + atomic64_add((u64)X, (atomic64_t *)(ulong)(A + insn->off));
>> + CONT;
>> +#endif
>
> I'm not too happy about instructions which are only available on
> certain architectures.
>
> I'd rather see best effort emulation than wholesale lack of support.
>
> We have an implementation of 64-bit atomics for 32-bit systems or
> those without true atomic compare-and-saw etc. ops in lib/atomic64.c
> so the routines are always available.
Good point. Will do.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists