[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140312230007.GA1817@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:08 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Cc: "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"minyard@....org" <minyard@....org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Change ACPI IPMI support to "default y"
On Tue 2014-02-18 23:15:08, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 00:26 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11:28:29 AM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >
> > > The ACPI IPMI driver implements IPMI operation region support for the ACPI
> > > core. Systems that declare ACPI operation regions may reference them at any
> > > time, including during kernel initialisation. These accesses will fail
> > > unless the ACPI IPMI driver is present, and undesirable system behaviour
> > > may result. Set the default to Y in order to encourage distributions and
> > > users to configure kernels to avoid awkward surprises.
> >
> > Do you have any examples of problems caused by that or is this just theoretical
> > at the moment?
>
> For example, if you load the ACPI power meter driver before you've
> installed the ACPI IPMI driver you'll typically get failures (most
> vendors implement it via IPMI).
Would the right solution be to implement dependency between power
meter and IMPI?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists