linux-kernel - Re: [sched/balance] INFO: possible recursive locking detected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5321618F.3090801@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:43:11 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [sched/balance] INFO: possible recursive locking detected

On 03/03/2014 10:25 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
> 
> https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git single-balance.bak
> commit 2adc591a5cb6768ad11e63be9011906aa171148d
> Author:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
> AuthorDate: Fri Feb 28 15:25:09 2014 +0800
> Commit:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
> CommitDate: Sun Mar 2 09:16:38 2014 +0800
> 
>     sched/balance: replace new_idle_balance
>     
>     Curren idle_balance will pull task on half of this group. That is
>     not needed in central balance.


Thanks for your testing, Fengguang!

I fixed this issue and updated to the git tree. Is the single-balance
branch still in your performance radar? :)

-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/