[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140313101202.GB11365@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:12:02 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnaldo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: ARM64: wire up perf_regs and unwind support
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:45:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 13 February 2014 18:06, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > This patch hooks in the perf_regs and libunwind code for ARM64.
> > > The tools/perf/arch/arm64 is created; it contains the arch specific
> > > code for DWARF unwinding.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
> > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> >
> > Ping on this patch. Can this one go into the perf tree?
>
> I'm happy to take it as well if there are no objections from the perf
> maintainers.
I object :) Last time I took a patch for perf tools (via the arm tree) it
ended in a conflict from hell and we vowed not to take tools patches via
arch trees again.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists