[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394705874.25873.19.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:17:54 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<jonathan.davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant mapping
Pulling out this one comment for the attention on the core Xen/Linux
maintainers.
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
[...]
> @@ -343,8 +347,26 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent, domid_t domid,
> vif->pending_prod = MAX_PENDING_REQS;
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_PENDING_REQS; i++)
> vif->pending_ring[i] = i;
> - for (i = 0; i < MAX_PENDING_REQS; i++)
> - vif->mmap_pages[i] = NULL;
> + spin_lock_init(&vif->callback_lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&vif->response_lock);
> + /* If ballooning is disabled, this will consume real memory, so you
> + * better enable it. The long term solution would be to use just a
> + * bunch of valid page descriptors, without dependency on ballooning
> + */
I wonder if we ought to enforce this via Kconfig? i.e. making
CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND (or the individual backends) depend on BALLOON (or
select?) or by making CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON non-optional etc.
IIRC David V was looking into a solution involving auto hotplugging a
new region to use for this case, but then I guess
CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG would equally need to be enabled.
> + err = alloc_xenballooned_pages(MAX_PENDING_REQS,
> + vif->mmap_pages,
> + false);
[...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists