[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53219FFA.3030204@metafoo.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:09:30 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
CC: davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, joelf@...com, vinod.koul@...el.com,
nsekhar@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, mporter@...aro.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 14/18] ASoC: davinci: Add edma dmaengine
platform driver
On 03/13/2014 12:56 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 12:28 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 03/13/2014 10:18 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: [...]
>>> +static const struct snd_pcm_hardware edma_pcm_hardware = { + .info
>>> = SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP | + SNDRV_PCM_INFO_MMAP_VALID | +
>>> SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH | + SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE |
>>> SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME | + SNDRV_PCM_INFO_INTERLEAVED, +
>>> .buffer_bytes_max = 128 * 1024, + .period_bytes_min = 32, +
>>> .period_bytes_max = 64 * 1024, + .periods_min = 2, +
>>> .periods_max = 19, /* Limit by edma dmaengine driver */ +};
>>
>> The idea is that we can auto-discover all the things using the
>> dma_slave_caps API. Too bad we removed the possibility to specify the
>> maximum number of segments from the API. Maybe we need to add it back. Is
>> the 19 a hard-limit or could it be worked around by software in the
>> dmaengine driver?
>
> The edma dmaengine driver will refuse to configure more than 20 paRAM slots (1
> for the channel + 19 for the periods). Depending on the SoC we might have
> different number of paRAM entries available. The intention with the limit was
> to prevent cases when we run out of paRAM entires for other devices because
> audio took most of them.
The reason why we removed the max_segments field from the slave_caps struct
was because we though it should be possible to, even when the hardware only
supports a fixed amount of segments, emulate support for more in software.
If this is not the case with the edma, we need to bring this field back.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists