[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403131420430.18573@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:32:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlo Caione <carlo.caione@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Add a new IRQF_ACK_BEFORE_UNMASK irq flag
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner | 2014-03-12 11:38:24 [+0100]:
>
> >Untested patch below.
> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>
> on DA850 / OMAP-L138. Without:
> 59: 560 cp_intc ohci_hcd:usb2
> with the patch
> 59: 280 cp_intc ohci_hcd:usb2
>
> that makes a difference of 280 interrupts. Prior the patch each
> interrupt was handled twice and returned once with IRQ_HANDLED and the
> second time with IRQ_NONE. With the proper EOI ack I don't see the
> IRQ_NONE anymore.
Right. The documentation of L138 clearly says, that you need to ack
the interrupt AFTER the handler has run. But the driver uses
handle_edge_irq, which acks BEFORE the handler has run.
Quality stuff.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists