[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394723102.17925.40.camel@acox1-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:05:02 +0000
From: "Cox, Alan" <alan.cox@...el.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] gpio / ACPI: Add support for ACPI GPIO operation
regions
> > + gpiod_set_raw_value(desc, !!((1 << i) & *value));
>
> What is this? How can the expression !!((1 << i) possibly evaluate to
> anything else than "true"? I don't get it. Just (desc, *value) seem more
> apropriate.
The expression is !!((1 << i) & *value)
so its the standard C sematic for 'logical and' ? 1 : 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists