lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:01:14 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, jkaluza@...hat.com, lpoetter@...hat.com, kay@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: Implement SO_PEERCGROUP On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 10:55 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> So give each container its own unix socket. Problem solved, no? > > Not really practical if you have hundreds of containers. I don't see the problem. Sockets are cheap. > > Simo. > -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists